neil-gaiman:

ebookporn:

• An Oxford comma walks into a bar, where it spends the evening watching the television, getting drunk, and smoking cigars.

• A dangling participle walks into a bar. Enjoying a cocktail and chatting with the bartender, the evening passes pleasantly.

• A bar was walked into by the passive voice.

• An oxymoron walked into a bar, and the silence was deafening.

• Two quotation marks walk into a “bar.”

• A malapropism walks into a bar, looking for all intensive purposes like a wolf in cheap clothing, muttering epitaphs and casting dispersions on his magnificent other, who takes him for granite.

• Hyperbole totally rips into this insane bar and absolutely destroys everything.

• A question mark walks into a bar?

• A non sequitur walks into a bar. In a strong wind, even turkeys can fly.

• Papyrus and Comic Sans walk into a bar. The bartender says, “Get out – we don’t serve your type.”

• A mixed metaphor walks into a bar, seeing the handwriting on the wall but hoping to nip it in the bud.

• A comma splice walks into a bar, it has a drink and then leaves.

• Three intransitive verbs walk into a bar. They sit. They converse. They depart.

• A synonym strolls into a tavern.

• At the end of the day, a cliché walks into a bar – fresh as a daisy, cute as a button, and sharp as a tack.

• A run-on sentence walks into a bar it starts flirting. With a cute little sentence fragment.

• Falling slowly, softly falling, the chiasmus collapses to the bar floor.

• A figure of speech literally walks into a bar and ends up getting figuratively hammered.

• An allusion walks into a bar, despite the fact that alcohol is its Achilles heel.

• The subjunctive would have walked into a bar, had it only known.

• A misplaced modifier walks into a bar owned by a man with a glass eye named Ralph.

• The past, present, and future walked into a bar. It was tense.

• A dyslexic walks into a bra.

• A verb walks into a bar, sees a beautiful noun, and suggests they conjugate. The noun declines.

• A simile walks into a bar, as parched as a desert.

• A gerund and an infinitive walk into a bar, drinking to forget.

• A hyphenated word and a non-hyphenated word walk into a bar and the bartender nearly chokes on the irony


- Jill Thomas Doyle

A zeugma walked into a bar, my life and trouble.

earhartsease:

queeranarchism:

theconcealedweapon:

image

& that 1% regret rate is almost entirely “Yes I’m still trans but the surgery was bad, or the transphobia i encounter is so much worse than anticipated, or I was pushed towards a specific treatment by my binary-oriented doctor when I wanted a non-binary transition” etc.

Actual ‘whoops, I don’t identify as trans anymore” cases are closer to 0,02%.

people absolutely get to detransition and retransition and whatever (I personally know about six people who “detransitioned” from being binary trans people, and then transitioned again later as nonbinary people, for example) but the idea that a small number of people going “oops got this wrong” somehow justifies gatekeeping everyone else is criminal, and mostly a deliberate ploy to block us from getting what we need

johannestevans:

does lowkey irk me when ppl are like “oh it’s so great to see media that doesn’t treat gay men as obsessed with sex and w their lives revolving around sex”

ok but i’m one of those gay men. what’s wrong with media about gay men like me? what makes us so unthinkable as protags?

like esp bc there’s not much positive media that does explore diff varieties of queer sluttiness and esp not for diff ages and demographics - i love fire island, i obviously like cucumber too, but a lot of the time gay sluttiness is on the side or is lowkey implied as villainous

like not being funny it’s just that there’s 10 million movies and tv series about straight men who are trying to fuck and sexually disappoint as many women as possible, and i won’t rest until there’s just as many works depicting queer men fucking and sucking other men

i demand a boring sci-fi action movie starring chiselled white man number 9 except that he keeps exchanging handies with another blandly “attractive” man in his dramatic flashbacks instead of having sex with a woman

(they do handjobs and frottage bc the astronaut service wouldn’t let him do anal and then in the third act of the movie he gets ass-blasted and all-the-way-throughed by a tentacled alien twice his size and he comes so hard the credits roll and it will make 10 billion dollars)

loverinstinct:

findersfeeders:

tlirsgender:

tlirsgender:

tlirsgender:

You ever think about how crows are acting not unlike how early humans probably did and you’re just like. Oh ok

I saw a Thing one time about how the earliest sign of civilization is a healed femur because that shows that we were taking care of each other because if we Didn’t a broken leg would mean you Die because you can’t. Do things

And I was thinking about this and I remembered also seeing an article about this one mated pair of crows where one of them broke its beak and thus couldn’t properly feed itself on its own. So the other one helps

So basically I have connected the two dots (“you didn’t connect shit”) I’ve connected them

And also they not only use tools but teach each other how to construct them, so uh

Really makes you think

Realistically I know immortality would kinda suck but I’d love to see where crows are going with this

Fun fact, there is little info on crows (as far as species of interest go) because they’re so good at evading human tactics for collection and observation. I had a friend who studied them in grad school. Not only do they describe humans to each other (so crows you’ve never seen before will avoid you), they also learn the precise distance of net cannons (for trapping and tagging) after 1 encounter and then stand at that distance the entire time (making naive researchers think maybe they can juuuust caych em). So basically you need to befriend them (a common strategy), or find a murder that’s never seen you before (researchers wear presidents masks to throw them off, but then they remember and describe the cars). In this case, you have one chance to collect enough in the group to get good data. Whatever crow you catch once, you probably will never catch again, ruling out biosensing devices (like they use with other birds and turtles n junk).

The latest big finding about crows is that they have a grasp of knowledge breadth, meaning they “know what they know” meaning they are conscious (self aware), have subjective experiences and can reflect on their knowledge. (Source) This also implies they have an understanding of the unknown.

Look up Andreas Nieder and Jon Marzluff’s work if you want the deep skinny.

@todaysbird

reblog if your name isn’t Amanda.

worldheritagepostorganization:

computationalcalculator:

llsilvertail:

yiffmaster:

iceslushii:

pastassassins:

2,121,566 people are not Amanda and counting!

We’ll find you Amanda.

this has almost 11 million notes what is this

I’ve never seen this post once in 10 years on this site

@hellsite-hall-of-fame

I’ve never even heard of this before tho??? Wtf??????????

oh my god, I didn’t think there were any surviving versions of this post left

For those who weren’t around in the Deep Lore times, this is one of the relics of the editable post era. This post has THE SINGLE HIGHEST NOTES of ANY post on this site, bar none, but with more than a dozen variations. Every single post you’ve ever seen with more than 3 million notes has been a different version of this one.

This is the “Dean’s Gym Shorts” post. This is the Flubber post. This is the original “Reblog if you support gay people” post. it was ALL of them. before half the site got nuked, it had even more notes than it has now - at one point, well over 15 million, and that was years ago.

This, with no exaggeration, is the ONE TRUE heritage post

World Heritage Post

injuries-in-dust:

fan-of-many-stories:

injuries-in-dust:

Hey, science side of tumblr…

Are bones and other remains from the last ice age really fossils?

Are they just considered remains? Or do they have a different scientific name?

How long does fossilization take, has enough time passed for them to become fossilised

Not science side but I know the answer! Fossilization is a process, not a length of time! Fossils are stone, they’re when the bone/other matter rots away and is filled in with another type of rock. Of they’re still organic, they’re remains!

And are there fossils that date back to the ice age?

According to Google, the lower end for fossilization is 10,000 years.  The last ice age lasted roughly 100,000 years, and ended about 11,000 years ago.

So yes.  There are both fossils and remains from the last ice age.  Nevada is actually working on a Ice Age Fossils State Park, but it’s a slow process to take a fossil-rich area and make it both accessible to the public and safe for the fossils, so I’m not sure when it’ll be ready.

banditherobot:

Anyone who watches Barbie and comes out of it thinking that it portrayed all men as stupid completely missed the fact that Ken read 3 books and then overthrew his local government in a matter of hours.

dduane:

lierdumoa:

Cringe started as a verb describing a physical reaction, i.e.: “I cringe when I see [x].”

Modern slang has turned cringe into an adjective describing anything to which a person might have such a reaction.

.

This shift in language is illustrative of a shift in culture.

.

For a while there, in the early 2000s, there was this big sex positivity movement and we talked openly about kink and queer sexuality and creating a culture of consent that broke away from traditional conservative ideas of moral respectability.

And now we are in the midst of this giant purity culture backlash, this giant push for rigid conformity all over the internet. Anything that deviates from the norm even remotely is ridiculed.

And this cultural shift is perfectly encapsulated in this singular linguistic shift, this verb becoming a noun.

The Revenge of the Pearl Clutchers

That’s what “cringing” is. It’s pearl clutching.

When the pearl clutchers turned cringe into an adjective, they turned a reaction into an accusation. The pearl clutchers don’t want to take responsibility for their own kneejerk emotions. They want to blame YOU.

They are saying, “My disgust isn’t the fault of my own backwards prejudices. It is YOU who are inherently disgusting. My inability to cope with even the slightest deviation from norm is not the problem here. YOUR refusal to rigidly conform is the problem. I am not the one who is cringing. YOU are the one who is cringe.”

Fuck ‘em.

.

Take the word back.

Cringe is not something people are.

It’s something judgmental assholes do.

This. THANK YOU.